Draft publications library test

This form is an application for an extension of time to file a document in the Second District Court of Appeal of the State of California.

•  The applicant must specify the document they need more time to file, the date by which they were originally supposed to file it, and the total number of days they are requesting an extension for.
•  The applicant must also state the reason(s) why they need more time to file the document.
•  The form must be signed by the applicant or counsel. 

The Second District Court of Appeal is providing a live video and audio feed of oral arguments due to concerns for the health and safety of the public and court employees. Only arguing counsel and one co-counsel are allowed in the courtroom, and all must wear masks and observe physical distancing. If any counsel or co-counsel show symptoms or test positive for COVID-19 within five days after being present at the court, they must call the Clerk's Office. These guidelines may be subject to change.

This document outlines the formatting requirements and guidelines for documents filed electronically with the Second District Court in California. This includes text-searchable PDFs, cover pages, pagination, electronic bookmarks, file size, multiple files, privacy protection, font style, spacing, margins, alignment, quotation marks, and hyperlinking.

This is a legal document from a court of appeal in California. Goldilocks is petitioning the court to vacate an order denying her motion for summary judgment. The document contains a Petition for Writ of [Type of Writ], a Verification, a Memorandum of Points and Authorities, a Certificate of Compliance, Exhibits, and Proof of Service.

This is a legal document from the Court of Appeal of California. It is an index of exhibits for a case involving Goldilocks, the Three Bears, and the Los Angeles County Superior Court. It includes documents such as a First Amended Complaint, Answer to First Amended Complaint, Notice of Motion for Summary Judgment, Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment, Separate Statement of Undisputed Facts in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment, and Declaration of Robert Southey in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment.

This case is about a dispute between The Three Bears and Goldilocks. The Three Bears sued Goldilocks for trespassing on their property, claiming she entered their home when they were not at home, ate their food, and fell asleep in one of their beds. After a trial, the court found Goldilocks guilty of trespass and ordered her to pay the Three Bears $50,000. Goldilocks is appealing the decision, arguing that she had implied consent to enter the house and her entry was not wrongful. The court of appeals will decide whether or not Goldilocks had implied consent to enter the Three Bears' house.