Draft publications library test
using this to organize pub content
Publications Library
-
This form is used by attorneys in California to file an appeal in a civil case. The form provides information about the parties, attorneys, and nature of the action, and requires service of documents on the Attorney General or other nonparty public officer or agency. The appeal must be filed within 15 days of the entry of the judgment or order.
- Details:
- Form
-
This form is used in appeals to the Court of Appeal in California. It provides information about the parties and attorneys involved in an appeal, the timeline of the appeal, and the nature of the action. It is important to read the instructions carefully and fill out all relevant sections accurately, and to attach a copy of the judgment or order being appealed. Service of the form must be done by someone who is not a party to the appeal. There are certain actions that require the service of documents on the Attorney General or other nonparty public officer or agency. When all pages of this document have been completed and a copy served, the original may then be filed with the court."
- Details:
- Form
-
This form is to accompany a civil notice of appeal per California Rules of Court, rule 8.100(e).
- Details:
- Form
-
Christopher Cottle was a Justice of the Court of Appeal 6th District who grew up in Los Angeles and went to Morningside High School. He was a good athlete and was involved in basketball, football, and baseball. He almost went to the University of California, but changed his mind and went to Stanford on a football scholarship. He was team captain his senior year and was a center on offense and a linebacker on defense. After graduating from Stanford, he worked for a year and then decided to go to law school at Hastings in San Francisco.
- Details:
- Transcript
-
Christopher Clarke Cottle was appointed to the Court of Appeal, Sixth Appellate District, by Governor Wilson in 1993 and confirmed by the Commission on Judicial Appointments. He was also confirmed by the electorate in 1994. Prior to this, he was an Associate Justice of the same court from 1988 to 1993. He was also a Judge of the Superior Court of Santa Cruz County from 1977 to 1988 and a District Attorney and Assistant District Attorney for Santa Cruz County from 1975 to 1977 and 1968 to 1975, respectively. He attended Stanford University on a football scholarship, and graduated from Hastings College of the Law in 1966. He is a Democrat and Episcopalian.
- Details:
- Biography
-
Charles W. Froehlich Jr. was a retired associate justice of the Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, Division One. He was appointed to the newly-created position by Governor Deukmejian in 1988 and confirmed by the electorate in 1990. Prior to this, he served as a judge of the Superior Court of San Diego County and worked as a private lawyer. He was a member of the California Judges Association, San Diego County Bar Association, and Old Globe Theatre. He also taught law at the University of California, Berkeley and San Diego State College. He enjoyed viticulture, enology, pomology, apiculture, and playing handball. He was a Republican and Methodist.
- Details:
- Biography
-
Justice Charles Vogel was the Administrative Presiding Justice of the Court of Appeal, Second District. He believes that it is important for judges to have a perspective of both civil and criminal cases. He was assigned to the "Onion Field Killings" case and worked on it alone without any support staff. He worked closely with Justice Otto Kaus who had a great sense of humor and was a genius. Justice Hastings also participated in the case.
- Details:
- Transcript
-
Charles S. Vogel was appointed to the Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division Four by Governor Wilson in 1995. He was previously appointed by Governor Wilson to the same court in 1992, and confirmed by the Commission on Judicial Appointments and the electorate in 1994. He was also appointed by Governor Reagan to the Superior Court in Los Angeles County in 1970 and the Municipal Court in Pomona Judicial District in 1969. He was a private law practitioner in Los Angeles and Pomona from 1959-1993 and served in the U.S. Navy from 1955-1956. He was a member of several organizations, including the American Bar Association, Los Angeles County Bar Association (President 1985-86), and the State Bar of California (President 1989-90). He was also honored as “Person of the Year” (1990) by Metropolitan News-Enterprise and “Alumnus of the Year” (1986) by UCLA School of Law Alumni Association. Charles S. Vogel was a Republican and Presbyterian.
- Details:
- Biography
-
California Law Review," correct? Charles Froehlich: Yes. Judith Haller: And you graduated in 1956. Charles Froehlich: Right. Justice Charles Froehlich is a retired Appellate Justice who has had a long and distinguished career in law. He was born in 1928 in San Jose, California and graduated from Fullerton High School. He then attended Stanford University, where he was in ROTC and graduated Phi Beta Kappa. After graduating, he served in the military during the Korean War and was awarded the Bronze Star. After his service, he attended Boalt Hall Law School at the University of California, where he was editor of the California Law Review. He graduated in 1956 and went on to have a successful career in law.
- Details:
- Transcript
-
This form is used to list interested entities or persons who have either (1) an ownership interest of 10 percent or more in the party if it is an entity; or (2) a financial or other interest in the outcome of the proceeding that the justices should consider in determining whether to disqualify themselves.
- Details:
- Form
-
This form is used to list interested entities or persons who have either (1) an ownership interest of 10 percent or more in the party if it is an entity; or (2) a financial or other interest in the outcome of the proceeding that the justices should consider in determining whether to disqualify themselves.
- Details:
- Form
-
This form is used to list interested entities or persons who have either (1) an ownership interest of 10 percent or more in the party if it is an entity; or (2) a financial or other interest in the outcome of the proceeding that the justices should consider in determining whether to disqualify themselves.
- Details:
- Form